What problem/issue is Jesus addressing in the form of a question?
Jesus is addressing the problem as to why did the village feel obligated to help and provide for the knocker at mightnight, the petitioner, and what made the village honor these specific values? Why is this the correct way to level instead of being morally selfish? What makes this system produced by the poor peasant farmers a representation to the Kingdom of God?
What is Jesus answer to these questions?
The village formed after they were somewhat secluded from the elite. They were the ones at the bottom and recognized that in order to stay productive and alive they needed to work together as a total community. They produced a sepecific way of living and values to abide by in order to stay a successful community.
The village was based upon reciprocation and honor.
They would not be selfish and they would provide for all. So when the petitioner came at night in the need for bread he was given it based upon the communities values. The traveler, though a stranger, was cared for because it was a value within the village to provide for the traveler with open arms in the best way possible. They recognized that if they were going to step on each others toes and try and out due their community they would ultimately be exlcuded once again. By funnctioning as a productive community they are far more advanced socially and economically than the elite.
Sunday, December 2, 2007
DP: Q and A
What problem/issue is Jesus addressing in the form of a question?
Jesus is addressing the problem as to why did the village feel obligated to help and provide for the knocker at mightnight, the petitioner, and what made the village honor these specific values? Why is this the correct way to level instead of being morally selfish? What makes this system produced by the poor peasant farmers a representation to the Kingdom of God?
What is Jesus answer to these questions?
The village formed after they were somewhat secluded from the elite. They were the ones at the bottom and recognized that in order to stay productive and alive they needed to work together as a total community. They produced a sepecific way of living and values to abide by in order to stay a successful community.
The village was based upon reciprocation and honor.
They would not be selfish and they would provide for all. So when the petitioner came at night in the need for bread he was given it based upon the communities values. The traveler, though a stranger, was cared for because it was a value within the village to provide for the traveler with open arms in the best way possible. They recognized that if they were going to step on each others toes and try and out due their community they would ultimately be exlcuded once again. By funnctioning as a productive community they are far more advanced socially and economically than the elite.
Jesus is addressing the problem as to why did the village feel obligated to help and provide for the knocker at mightnight, the petitioner, and what made the village honor these specific values? Why is this the correct way to level instead of being morally selfish? What makes this system produced by the poor peasant farmers a representation to the Kingdom of God?
What is Jesus answer to these questions?
The village formed after they were somewhat secluded from the elite. They were the ones at the bottom and recognized that in order to stay productive and alive they needed to work together as a total community. They produced a sepecific way of living and values to abide by in order to stay a successful community.
The village was based upon reciprocation and honor.
They would not be selfish and they would provide for all. So when the petitioner came at night in the need for bread he was given it based upon the communities values. The traveler, though a stranger, was cared for because it was a value within the village to provide for the traveler with open arms in the best way possible. They recognized that if they were going to step on each others toes and try and out due their community they would ultimately be exlcuded once again. By funnctioning as a productive community they are far more advanced socially and economically than the elite.
Thursday, November 15, 2007
MakeUP: Tenant Assesment 10/10/07
When looking at the Parable of The Wicked tenants and its meaning, especially in regards to the rejected conner-stone, it becomes clear that the rejected land of the land owner is just as the people of the lower class during the time, rejected by the elite for something more self-beneficiary. The parable implies that it's not enough to leave the people be then come back for payment. With the power of being a elite, you must understand the responsibility that comes with the territory. The idea built in the parable and the readings before in after is that to fully grasp society and make it like the kingdom of God, the ones with the power must recognize and appreciate the people that work for them, and understanding that these people are the conner-stone of all society, without the work there would be nothing for the elite to own, cherish, or even rule over. It's up to those who the story is being told to, the lawyers,priest, and elders, to step up and do the right thing. This parable is a call to action by Jesus, to the oppressors of the lowly, workers, and overall muscle of society. This story relates exactly to the work of Cesar Chavez and the United Farm Workers Union. He, like Jesus, was calling out to the elite, landowners, to step up and recognize the hard work and success of the poor workers; showing that the workers were the cornerstone for all of harvest, work, and profit.
Tuesday, November 13, 2007
"Parable Documention."
1. Read the parable: Read writings before and after the assigned parable to gain a greater context for which the parable it set. (Background Information)
Don't interpret on your first read: Read the parable for what it is. Look for details and draw an outline. Define terms you don't know.
2. Determine who, in your opinion, who is the main character and provide evidence as to why the story revolves around that character.
3. What is the conflict- why is Jesus telling this specific parables. Who is telling the story? Who is the Story being told to? What is the message being said?
4. Figure out the parts of the parable that don't make sense. Ask questions? Look at every detail.
5. Find the value or lesson of the story
6. Apply to modern day.
ANSWERS
1. In the parable of the "Knock at Midnight" the main character is the man knocking on the door. The story revolves around the question posed by Jesus' disciples of how to pray. Jesus then beings by showing the disciples as a man traveling at midnight, knocking on someones door. The storyteller, Jesus, tells us alot about the traveler through his persistence and his shamelessness. This also depicts a round character, in that he uses his emotions and physicality in the story. These reasons, show why the traveler would be the main character.
2. The story revolves around the conflict externally of the man knocking at midnight trying to get some bread. Internally, the conflict or problem is, what is the right way to pray. The setting of the parable is used because of the familiarity of the subject with Jesus' disciples. All the disciples were enriched in Jewish custom and could understand the abnormality of the man refusing the traveler bread. By relating to something really close, Jesus' message could be reached rather easily. The story is directed to Jesus' disciples, and all those present to Jesus' preaching. Mainly the story serves as a reminder to the people of villages like the one depicted, to remain faithful to Jewish custom, even if it's hard to do.
3. Characters:
The Traveler: A man in obvious need of bread. After all it is midnight. He is persistent in his call for the food, even though his friend turns him away, even yells at him. However, the traveler is persistent in his call for bread without any shame, he knows he needs help and is looking for help through his friend.
The Man in the House: Tired, obviously wants to sleep and not deal with his friends calls. He's agitated, tired, and down right not willing to help out of friendliness.
The man is a part of a "nucleated village", a village that was near some sort of large market and was built around a town well and oven. This type of village was one that would stay true to Jewish customs such as sharing with neighbors and especially sharing with "aliens" or outside visitors.
4. Whys?
Questions from the text:
What is the significance of the traveler appearing in the night?
Why does the man of the house act like he does...especially when it's not customary?
What is the main point of persistence?
Are we being told to be annoying so we can get what we want?
Don't interpret on your first read: Read the parable for what it is. Look for details and draw an outline. Define terms you don't know.
2. Determine who, in your opinion, who is the main character and provide evidence as to why the story revolves around that character.
3. What is the conflict- why is Jesus telling this specific parables. Who is telling the story? Who is the Story being told to? What is the message being said?
4. Figure out the parts of the parable that don't make sense. Ask questions? Look at every detail.
5. Find the value or lesson of the story
6. Apply to modern day.
ANSWERS
1. In the parable of the "Knock at Midnight" the main character is the man knocking on the door. The story revolves around the question posed by Jesus' disciples of how to pray. Jesus then beings by showing the disciples as a man traveling at midnight, knocking on someones door. The storyteller, Jesus, tells us alot about the traveler through his persistence and his shamelessness. This also depicts a round character, in that he uses his emotions and physicality in the story. These reasons, show why the traveler would be the main character.
2. The story revolves around the conflict externally of the man knocking at midnight trying to get some bread. Internally, the conflict or problem is, what is the right way to pray. The setting of the parable is used because of the familiarity of the subject with Jesus' disciples. All the disciples were enriched in Jewish custom and could understand the abnormality of the man refusing the traveler bread. By relating to something really close, Jesus' message could be reached rather easily. The story is directed to Jesus' disciples, and all those present to Jesus' preaching. Mainly the story serves as a reminder to the people of villages like the one depicted, to remain faithful to Jewish custom, even if it's hard to do.
3. Characters:
The Traveler: A man in obvious need of bread. After all it is midnight. He is persistent in his call for the food, even though his friend turns him away, even yells at him. However, the traveler is persistent in his call for bread without any shame, he knows he needs help and is looking for help through his friend.
The Man in the House: Tired, obviously wants to sleep and not deal with his friends calls. He's agitated, tired, and down right not willing to help out of friendliness.
The man is a part of a "nucleated village", a village that was near some sort of large market and was built around a town well and oven. This type of village was one that would stay true to Jewish customs such as sharing with neighbors and especially sharing with "aliens" or outside visitors.
4. Whys?
Questions from the text:
What is the significance of the traveler appearing in the night?
Why does the man of the house act like he does...especially when it's not customary?
What is the main point of persistence?
Are we being told to be annoying so we can get what we want?
Monday, November 12, 2007
"Herzog"
Herzog starts off by saying that travelers at night occured to beat the heat of the day. However this was usually only seen in derserts and places close to seas shoresm i.e seabreeze.
Bread was always at the ready and never cooked at a certain time. Low income peasants we able sustain their bread until is was all gone. There was a communal oven that enivetibly showed every who was packed the freshness. A normal meal had about 2 loaves of bread. 3 fresh loaves were given to guests as a part of strict jewish custom.
As a part of custom, hosts gave more food then the guest could possibly eat and the guest was always obligized to eat. The bread is dipped into a dish or salt. A guest is considered a guest to the entire village. The host would gather from the village if he was unable to provide for his guest. Because of the demands of customs and the vaule of tradition, it's hardly unlikely that a peasant would not answer the call of a guest at night. The village would see him as an a-hole.
The word Anaideian means "shamelessly". Anaideian refers to the sleeping neighbor. This tries to draw the conclusion that praying to god enough will bugg him so much that he;ll have to listen. However, the researcher, Bailey, determined that anaideian actually means "avoidance of shame". Therefore showing that God is here to hear us.
The setting of the parable is in a "nucleated village". A village that was near some sort of large market and was built around a town well and oven.
Peasants of this time believed that all good in life was limited. They stated that land, wealth, healath, friendship, love, manlieness, honor, respect, status, power, influence, security and safety always existed in limited quantity. To get more of this good you had to run others over and take their share.
The peasant farmer was concerned with one thing, protect and provide for the family. The Elites would offer protection in exchange for substinance. For every mistake made, there was someone there to bath in your wrong. People only helped others with the expentancy that the help would be returned.
The parable states that the begger is a long traveller looking for a place to eat. Since he is from far away, the resident has to obligation to feed him. Hospitality is in the name of Abraham and of the Torah.
The Torah was the souce of drawing boundries. Urban elites used Torah as rules of purity. Offering hospitaltiy challenged the elite that bounded the peasants. The elite recieved
Bread was always at the ready and never cooked at a certain time. Low income peasants we able sustain their bread until is was all gone. There was a communal oven that enivetibly showed every who was packed the freshness. A normal meal had about 2 loaves of bread. 3 fresh loaves were given to guests as a part of strict jewish custom.
As a part of custom, hosts gave more food then the guest could possibly eat and the guest was always obligized to eat. The bread is dipped into a dish or salt. A guest is considered a guest to the entire village. The host would gather from the village if he was unable to provide for his guest. Because of the demands of customs and the vaule of tradition, it's hardly unlikely that a peasant would not answer the call of a guest at night. The village would see him as an a-hole.
The word Anaideian means "shamelessly". Anaideian refers to the sleeping neighbor. This tries to draw the conclusion that praying to god enough will bugg him so much that he;ll have to listen. However, the researcher, Bailey, determined that anaideian actually means "avoidance of shame". Therefore showing that God is here to hear us.
The setting of the parable is in a "nucleated village". A village that was near some sort of large market and was built around a town well and oven.
Peasants of this time believed that all good in life was limited. They stated that land, wealth, healath, friendship, love, manlieness, honor, respect, status, power, influence, security and safety always existed in limited quantity. To get more of this good you had to run others over and take their share.
The peasant farmer was concerned with one thing, protect and provide for the family. The Elites would offer protection in exchange for substinance. For every mistake made, there was someone there to bath in your wrong. People only helped others with the expentancy that the help would be returned.
The parable states that the begger is a long traveller looking for a place to eat. Since he is from far away, the resident has to obligation to feed him. Hospitality is in the name of Abraham and of the Torah.
The Torah was the souce of drawing boundries. Urban elites used Torah as rules of purity. Offering hospitaltiy challenged the elite that bounded the peasants. The elite recieved
Tuesday, November 6, 2007
Revised Methods
1. Read the parable: Read writings before and after the assigned parable to gain a greater context for which the parable it set. (Background Information)
Don't interpet on your first read: Read the parable for what it is. Look for details and draw an outline. Define terms you don't know.
2. Determine who, in your opninon, who is the main character and provide evidence as to why the story revolves around that character.
3. What is the conflict- why is Jesus telling this specific parables. Who is telling the story? Who is the Story being told to? What is the message being said?
4. Figure out the parts of the parable that don't make sense. Ask questions? Look at every detail.
5. Find the vaule or lesson of the story
6. Apply to modern day.
Don't interpet on your first read: Read the parable for what it is. Look for details and draw an outline. Define terms you don't know.
2. Determine who, in your opninon, who is the main character and provide evidence as to why the story revolves around that character.
3. What is the conflict- why is Jesus telling this specific parables. Who is telling the story? Who is the Story being told to? What is the message being said?
4. Figure out the parts of the parable that don't make sense. Ask questions? Look at every detail.
5. Find the vaule or lesson of the story
6. Apply to modern day.
Sunday, November 4, 2007
"Interpretation Methodology."
Method:
1. Read the Parable
2. Read the Parable
3. Read the Stories before and After the Parable Assigned.
4. Do a little research: look into keys terms offered in the Parable: see if you can find something helpful to help your understand images.
5. Identify the main character in the story: What is his roll? Why is he doing what he does?
6. Identify who the parable is spoken to: see what their roll in society is.
7. Relate what is happening then to what is happening today.
8. Take as many vantages as you can: look at the story from more then one perspective.
9. Read literally: don't read to deeply into the "hiddens"
10. Talk about it with other people: see what your parents think, classmates, Sutphin
1. Read the Parable
2. Read the Parable
3. Read the Stories before and After the Parable Assigned.
4. Do a little research: look into keys terms offered in the Parable: see if you can find something helpful to help your understand images.
5. Identify the main character in the story: What is his roll? Why is he doing what he does?
6. Identify who the parable is spoken to: see what their roll in society is.
7. Relate what is happening then to what is happening today.
8. Take as many vantages as you can: look at the story from more then one perspective.
9. Read literally: don't read to deeply into the "hiddens"
10. Talk about it with other people: see what your parents think, classmates, Sutphin
Tuesday, October 30, 2007
System Examples
When looking at the Country Side case, no one helped out the man because they we're part of the Country Side system. By helping the man out, they would be going against their employer and taking away cash value from the company. It's an example about how it's all about the win. Country Side could really care less about the man's medical and language issues, they go for blood and blood is what they got.
In the case of me having no affiliation with Country Side, I would hope to see a deal cut with the man and his family to get the house back to him if not for no fee, then at least 1/2 of what they we're asking.
We would have different moral responses because of our uniqueness in up-bringing, society, and human nature. Personally if I was involved with the case I would start a Hell Storm with Country Side. On the other hand, if I was with Country Side, I would probably be conformed to the company but the morals I grew up with would leave me in a state of utter heartache trying to separate my passion for life from my work life.
Stanford Prison
The experiment held at Stanford tells us that authority, conformity, and power have great take over powers in our human nature. The feeling you get from power is like no other. The system is set up to have everyone in a race for power. So when power is given their is a sense of not only accomplishment but now dominance over others. The most normal people cannot withstand the sensation that is presented.
In the case of me having no affiliation with Country Side, I would hope to see a deal cut with the man and his family to get the house back to him if not for no fee, then at least 1/2 of what they we're asking.
We would have different moral responses because of our uniqueness in up-bringing, society, and human nature. Personally if I was involved with the case I would start a Hell Storm with Country Side. On the other hand, if I was with Country Side, I would probably be conformed to the company but the morals I grew up with would leave me in a state of utter heartache trying to separate my passion for life from my work life.
Stanford Prison
The experiment held at Stanford tells us that authority, conformity, and power have great take over powers in our human nature. The feeling you get from power is like no other. The system is set up to have everyone in a race for power. So when power is given their is a sense of not only accomplishment but now dominance over others. The most normal people cannot withstand the sensation that is presented.
Sunday, October 28, 2007
The System
Why are most systems self-serving, unethical, and conservative?
SOCIETY IS SURVIVAL OF THE ECONOMICALLY FITTEST. When this question was proposed in class, I immediately had two split reactions, one that believed in the question and one that challenged it. When we think of the oppression of systems we often designate a certain group of people whether it be by race, social class, or any other type of category. This shows the prejudice of the system. When thinking about this it came to me that systems are all about winners. Companies will do anything to better themselves, by almost any means necessary, i.e. taking over small businesses, clearing areas for buildings. In today's world, wee see big tech companies like Oracle wiping out any threat and then leaving thousands of people jobless, proving that the system is all about the win. If we take a humanitarian approach, Hurricane Katrina was the way it was because those who were left basically to die were the losers, the ones who in the system's eyes cannot move society forward. In the system's eyes, it's not worth the risk to save or protect the weak. This "conservative" approach shows that its all about keeping the tip of the iceberg afloat, and letting everyone drown below. In our world, life is about the WIN. In sports, coaches could really care less about that 37th man on the team, the want the win. Society is survival of the economically fittest.
PART 2
My other feeling on the subject was one of almost sincere disbelief and almost anger towards those who blame the system for their troubles and their strife. It seems that today people are more into excuses and hand outs then they are to the ideals and principles that our country was founded on. The idea of individualism has been lost in todays world because of a almost lazy attitude that says "it's not my fault". Well to be honest, it is your fault. Accountability for ones self is something rarely seen any more. My parents are perfect examples of how you can beat the system if you just suck it up and fight back with your brain. My dad came from a family of blue collar, poor, carpenters. He took his blows, had to make his way through tough times, mean streets, and all the other "problems" of life. But he didn't let that get him down, he graduated high school, didn't any type of money for college, so he served his country, got what education he could, even with the drawbacks of being in the military. He worked everyday to make himself better. 20 years later, he's living the life he dreamed for, getting to see the places he never thought he would get to see. And it's because he didn't sit back and make excuses for his woes. Everyone has the chance to make it and break the oppression of the system. Their are kids here at saint Marys who are living proof. They are taking advantage of the programs set up in rough areas and are making it. Our country was built off hard work and the belief that the individual spirit and drive could not be touched by any group. If your not the best player on the team, don't cry about it, go work your butt off and be somebody. Laziness is the disease of Americans today and the reason why system oppression is the way it is.
Part 1 (in class)-Group Analysis
Society(System) is set up to us human nature as a tool against the people. In psychology studies, it is proven that it is human nature to ignore the mistakes of others because of society's I can do it better mentality. In every history text it is proven that the same mistakes are made over and over again. THIS IS THE SYSTEM!! The system makes us believe that we can do anything better then anyone before, even if it's been proven wrong time and time again. By having people live this life, those who are on top of the system control all aspects of popular life i.e. authority, economics, and practically everyday life. The only ones who beat the system are the ones who are even aware that it's there.
SOCIETY IS SURVIVAL OF THE ECONOMICALLY FITTEST. When this question was proposed in class, I immediately had two split reactions, one that believed in the question and one that challenged it. When we think of the oppression of systems we often designate a certain group of people whether it be by race, social class, or any other type of category. This shows the prejudice of the system. When thinking about this it came to me that systems are all about winners. Companies will do anything to better themselves, by almost any means necessary, i.e. taking over small businesses, clearing areas for buildings. In today's world, wee see big tech companies like Oracle wiping out any threat and then leaving thousands of people jobless, proving that the system is all about the win. If we take a humanitarian approach, Hurricane Katrina was the way it was because those who were left basically to die were the losers, the ones who in the system's eyes cannot move society forward. In the system's eyes, it's not worth the risk to save or protect the weak. This "conservative" approach shows that its all about keeping the tip of the iceberg afloat, and letting everyone drown below. In our world, life is about the WIN. In sports, coaches could really care less about that 37th man on the team, the want the win. Society is survival of the economically fittest.
PART 2
My other feeling on the subject was one of almost sincere disbelief and almost anger towards those who blame the system for their troubles and their strife. It seems that today people are more into excuses and hand outs then they are to the ideals and principles that our country was founded on. The idea of individualism has been lost in todays world because of a almost lazy attitude that says "it's not my fault". Well to be honest, it is your fault. Accountability for ones self is something rarely seen any more. My parents are perfect examples of how you can beat the system if you just suck it up and fight back with your brain. My dad came from a family of blue collar, poor, carpenters. He took his blows, had to make his way through tough times, mean streets, and all the other "problems" of life. But he didn't let that get him down, he graduated high school, didn't any type of money for college, so he served his country, got what education he could, even with the drawbacks of being in the military. He worked everyday to make himself better. 20 years later, he's living the life he dreamed for, getting to see the places he never thought he would get to see. And it's because he didn't sit back and make excuses for his woes. Everyone has the chance to make it and break the oppression of the system. Their are kids here at saint Marys who are living proof. They are taking advantage of the programs set up in rough areas and are making it. Our country was built off hard work and the belief that the individual spirit and drive could not be touched by any group. If your not the best player on the team, don't cry about it, go work your butt off and be somebody. Laziness is the disease of Americans today and the reason why system oppression is the way it is.
Part 1 (in class)-Group Analysis
Society(System) is set up to us human nature as a tool against the people. In psychology studies, it is proven that it is human nature to ignore the mistakes of others because of society's I can do it better mentality. In every history text it is proven that the same mistakes are made over and over again. THIS IS THE SYSTEM!! The system makes us believe that we can do anything better then anyone before, even if it's been proven wrong time and time again. By having people live this life, those who are on top of the system control all aspects of popular life i.e. authority, economics, and practically everyday life. The only ones who beat the system are the ones who are even aware that it's there.
Sunday, October 21, 2007
Parable of the Unmerciful Servant
1) Who is the story about? Who is the main character? The King or the high level servant? Why? 2) Why does the King decide to forgive the debt? 3) Why does the servant not follow the example of the king and forgive the debt? 4) If the Kingdom of God is like this parable, then what do we learn about the Kingdom of God?
1. The story is about a servant who has a very large debt, practically millioins of dollars in today's terms, to his ruling king. The main character in the story is the servant who was to pay back his debt to his king because the story revolves around the servants reception of compassion and then his choice to not return the favor given him by his king. The king is a very vital part however, because his example of love and compassion is the main ideal set for the parable.
2. The King decides to forgive the debt because of two reasons. The first is that the King took pity on his poor servant and his economic situtaion. He felt moved by the servant's heart's desire to save his family from a life of slavery because of his own faults. Another perspective is that the King, who was indeed a King, didn't have any true rush to gather the debts because after all his was a king, so he most likely had more dough than a bakery. But, for religious sake, he took great pity on his "humble" servant.
3. The servant does not follow the example of the king and forgive the debt because the servant is not affraid of his fellow servant like he is of the king. He sees that other servant as no better then him and not deserving of his compassion. Its all about social stature. It's like a student kissing a teachers rear for an extension, then punching a classmate who doesn't have the assignmen on him. There's no level of respect.
4. We learn that the Kingdom of God is an ideal of equality;that no one man is greater then any other man. It's like a chain-effect, to truly understand and be a part of the Kingdom of God you have to continue the flow of love and compassion to others. It is not enough to just receive. To be apart of the Kingdom of God, you must do unto others and you wish others to do unto you. (The Golden Rule)!!
1. The story is about a servant who has a very large debt, practically millioins of dollars in today's terms, to his ruling king. The main character in the story is the servant who was to pay back his debt to his king because the story revolves around the servants reception of compassion and then his choice to not return the favor given him by his king. The king is a very vital part however, because his example of love and compassion is the main ideal set for the parable.
2. The King decides to forgive the debt because of two reasons. The first is that the King took pity on his poor servant and his economic situtaion. He felt moved by the servant's heart's desire to save his family from a life of slavery because of his own faults. Another perspective is that the King, who was indeed a King, didn't have any true rush to gather the debts because after all his was a king, so he most likely had more dough than a bakery. But, for religious sake, he took great pity on his "humble" servant.
3. The servant does not follow the example of the king and forgive the debt because the servant is not affraid of his fellow servant like he is of the king. He sees that other servant as no better then him and not deserving of his compassion. Its all about social stature. It's like a student kissing a teachers rear for an extension, then punching a classmate who doesn't have the assignmen on him. There's no level of respect.
4. We learn that the Kingdom of God is an ideal of equality;that no one man is greater then any other man. It's like a chain-effect, to truly understand and be a part of the Kingdom of God you have to continue the flow of love and compassion to others. It is not enough to just receive. To be apart of the Kingdom of God, you must do unto others and you wish others to do unto you. (The Golden Rule)!!
Monday, October 15, 2007
U.S. Involvement
44. How does the U.S. support Israel?
45. Why was the Bush administration so much less involved than the Clinton administration in Israel-Palestine diplomacy?
46. What has the Bush administrations Middle East policy been all about?
45. The United States support Israel in major ways. This support comes in the form of military, financial, and diplomatic support. Over 25% of U.S. foreign aid goes to Israel, totaling just about $5 billion annually. This money is then sent back into the U.S. economy as Israel buys U.S. produced and made weapons and appliances. Almost every weapon owned by the Israeli government is U.S. made. The most controversial form of support from the U.S. comes in their diplomatic support in the U.N. The U.S. defends Israel in every aspect. Whenever there has been a U.N. violation committed by Israel, the U.S. is always there to defend them and veto any commission that may harm Israel. This support system by the U.S. is really the only reason Israel stands as it does today, without the U.S.
46. The Bush administration has been much less involved than the Clinton administration in Israel-Palestine diplomacy for many reasons. However there are two that are most relevant in our lives today. The first reason is that many of President Bush's advisers and administration are deeply invested in Arab controlled Oil manufacturing. By keeping a looser relationship with Israel, these investors can maintain a healthier and stronger relationship with those who control their money. The main reason for lack of involvement is because of our own issues at home with the 9/11 attack and War on Terrorism. The Bush administration saw that they were simply too occupied with our own safety to deal with the conflict of another people. So, their veto pen and funding is about the only involvement in the conflict. President Clinton didn't have a war or any homeland terrorist attack from another country to deal with. Also, during his Presidency he oversaw the largest economic boom the country has ever seen, thanks to the birth of the dot-com!
47. The Bush administration Middle East policy has been about keeping our country ahead and out of harm's way. Funding for Israel has been maintained, but after the 9/11 attacks, the Bush administration sought out to strengthen ties with Arab nations to ensure the safety of our people. This led to a bit of separation between us (United States) and Israel. Too really drive home the idea that the U.S. was serious about our own protection and our commitment to the Arab world, President Bush and then Secretary of State Collin Powell, called for a "State of Palestine" and "for the occupation to end." This shows how the Bush administration's policy on the Middle East is to save ourselves before the others.
45. Why was the Bush administration so much less involved than the Clinton administration in Israel-Palestine diplomacy?
46. What has the Bush administrations Middle East policy been all about?
45. The United States support Israel in major ways. This support comes in the form of military, financial, and diplomatic support. Over 25% of U.S. foreign aid goes to Israel, totaling just about $5 billion annually. This money is then sent back into the U.S. economy as Israel buys U.S. produced and made weapons and appliances. Almost every weapon owned by the Israeli government is U.S. made. The most controversial form of support from the U.S. comes in their diplomatic support in the U.N. The U.S. defends Israel in every aspect. Whenever there has been a U.N. violation committed by Israel, the U.S. is always there to defend them and veto any commission that may harm Israel. This support system by the U.S. is really the only reason Israel stands as it does today, without the U.S.
46. The Bush administration has been much less involved than the Clinton administration in Israel-Palestine diplomacy for many reasons. However there are two that are most relevant in our lives today. The first reason is that many of President Bush's advisers and administration are deeply invested in Arab controlled Oil manufacturing. By keeping a looser relationship with Israel, these investors can maintain a healthier and stronger relationship with those who control their money. The main reason for lack of involvement is because of our own issues at home with the 9/11 attack and War on Terrorism. The Bush administration saw that they were simply too occupied with our own safety to deal with the conflict of another people. So, their veto pen and funding is about the only involvement in the conflict. President Clinton didn't have a war or any homeland terrorist attack from another country to deal with. Also, during his Presidency he oversaw the largest economic boom the country has ever seen, thanks to the birth of the dot-com!
47. The Bush administration Middle East policy has been about keeping our country ahead and out of harm's way. Funding for Israel has been maintained, but after the 9/11 attacks, the Bush administration sought out to strengthen ties with Arab nations to ensure the safety of our people. This led to a bit of separation between us (United States) and Israel. Too really drive home the idea that the U.S. was serious about our own protection and our commitment to the Arab world, President Bush and then Secretary of State Collin Powell, called for a "State of Palestine" and "for the occupation to end." This shows how the Bush administration's policy on the Middle East is to save ourselves before the others.
Sunday, October 14, 2007
NPR: Sections 3-7
Section 3:
After the end of WWII, the Zionist movement took full force. As the European Jews migrated to the Middle East, their British support became weak, to the point that it didn't exist. The U.N. attempted to take control of the issue by declaring a new state of Israel and Palestine. The Palestinians rejected the idea and War broke out. Israel took on the surrounding Arab nations, defeated them, and created a new generation of Palestinian refugees.
Section 4:
In 1967 the Six-Day War between Israel and the combined forces of Egypt, Syria, and Jordan, occurred. In this war, Israel beat the snot out of their enemies and took control of the Sinai territory, Gaza Strip, West Bank, and Golan Heights. All these territories became occupied and the Arabs there were now under Israeli control, creating more refugees.
Section 5:
In the early 70's it became clear after attacks on Arabs and Israeli es, that talks of peace and compromise were needed. Israel signed a Peace Treaty with Egypt which lead for to a change in the Palestinians attitudes. Led by Yassir Arafat, the PLO began to take a more diplomatic approach towards their relations with Israel, at least for the time being.
Section 6:
In 1987, after 20 years of Israeli rule, all out fighting occurred between the Palestinians and Israel. This continued for 5 years. During this time Israel was spilt between leaders, one who favored extermination and one who favored talking. In 1992 PM Rabin reached a peace agreement with the PLO, the Oslo peace agreement of 1993. (signed on the White House Front Lawn)
Section 7:
The talks of the early 90's never really got anywhere. PM Rabin was assinated by the extremist Israelis. Hamas heated up their suicide attacks and negotiations between both sides ceased to exist. Today the intensity of fighting is higher then ever.
After the end of WWII, the Zionist movement took full force. As the European Jews migrated to the Middle East, their British support became weak, to the point that it didn't exist. The U.N. attempted to take control of the issue by declaring a new state of Israel and Palestine. The Palestinians rejected the idea and War broke out. Israel took on the surrounding Arab nations, defeated them, and created a new generation of Palestinian refugees.
Section 4:
In 1967 the Six-Day War between Israel and the combined forces of Egypt, Syria, and Jordan, occurred. In this war, Israel beat the snot out of their enemies and took control of the Sinai territory, Gaza Strip, West Bank, and Golan Heights. All these territories became occupied and the Arabs there were now under Israeli control, creating more refugees.
Section 5:
In the early 70's it became clear after attacks on Arabs and Israeli es, that talks of peace and compromise were needed. Israel signed a Peace Treaty with Egypt which lead for to a change in the Palestinians attitudes. Led by Yassir Arafat, the PLO began to take a more diplomatic approach towards their relations with Israel, at least for the time being.
Section 6:
In 1987, after 20 years of Israeli rule, all out fighting occurred between the Palestinians and Israel. This continued for 5 years. During this time Israel was spilt between leaders, one who favored extermination and one who favored talking. In 1992 PM Rabin reached a peace agreement with the PLO, the Oslo peace agreement of 1993. (signed on the White House Front Lawn)
Section 7:
The talks of the early 90's never really got anywhere. PM Rabin was assinated by the extremist Israelis. Hamas heated up their suicide attacks and negotiations between both sides ceased to exist. Today the intensity of fighting is higher then ever.
Sunday, September 30, 2007
"Letter to Senator."
EDUCATION FOR ALL ACT 2007
(S. 1259 / H.R. 2092
JUBILEE ACT FOR RESPONSIBLE LENDING AND EXPANDED DEBT CANCELATION
(HR 2634)
U.S. COMMITMENT TO GLOBAL CHILD SURVIVAL ACT
After studying the work of Dr. Jeffery Sachs, my once firm belief in taking care of "yours and yours alone," has been broken into pieces as I see the great work that has been done by the U.N. Millinieum Project. Truly everyone in our world deserves the right to life. After reading through several breakdowns on the U.S Commitment to Global Child Survival Act and the Jubilee Act for Responsible Lending and Expanded Debt Cancelation (HR 2634), I now see that action is needed and needed fast. The debts of countries who can barely stand on two feet should be no concern to those who countries who can run. Their need is far greater then our own. However, this doesn't go to say that their future debts will all be forgiven. I just think that a new start is a reasonable request. Once these debts are forgiven and revenue beings to build up the Global Child Survival Act will be in full swing and the young of this generation will be in full health and adults. This will then lead a generation of adults who understand the importance of health care and life. Soon the money saved from the cruched debts will be put into a national system of health for the once impovrished nations.
The right to live is the greatest right we hold as humans, however, the right to be educated is suprisingly probably our second greatest right, or at least in my mind. Through education we are able to put our own thoughts together and expand our mind to more then we can see. Education is responsible for everything we see around us in our world today. So who's to say that everyone shouldn't at least have a shot. Growing up and around Richmond California, I have seen a great number of people who had their lives changed simply because of a book. To these individuals, realizing that there is more out there then just what they see, is the biggest step in their lives. The being to stray away from their hardships like gang violence and fights and move towards a life of promise and potential. This is just one example of many.
After studying the current situtation Africa and talking to those who have seen it first hand, it too has become clear that education has not only changed their lives but improved them drastically. Many farming techniques and helpful adivice weren't just thrown at the people, they were learned. A teacher I talked to recently about this topic also told me how much the impovrished of the Sub-Saharian thrist for knowlodge and truly want to have an opportunity in life.
All in all these topics come down to nothing more then morals and integirty. It is only by looking in your heart that you can see the value in helping the world.
(S. 1259 / H.R. 2092
JUBILEE ACT FOR RESPONSIBLE LENDING AND EXPANDED DEBT CANCELATION
(HR 2634)
U.S. COMMITMENT TO GLOBAL CHILD SURVIVAL ACT
After studying the work of Dr. Jeffery Sachs, my once firm belief in taking care of "yours and yours alone," has been broken into pieces as I see the great work that has been done by the U.N. Millinieum Project. Truly everyone in our world deserves the right to life. After reading through several breakdowns on the U.S Commitment to Global Child Survival Act and the Jubilee Act for Responsible Lending and Expanded Debt Cancelation (HR 2634), I now see that action is needed and needed fast. The debts of countries who can barely stand on two feet should be no concern to those who countries who can run. Their need is far greater then our own. However, this doesn't go to say that their future debts will all be forgiven. I just think that a new start is a reasonable request. Once these debts are forgiven and revenue beings to build up the Global Child Survival Act will be in full swing and the young of this generation will be in full health and adults. This will then lead a generation of adults who understand the importance of health care and life. Soon the money saved from the cruched debts will be put into a national system of health for the once impovrished nations.
The right to live is the greatest right we hold as humans, however, the right to be educated is suprisingly probably our second greatest right, or at least in my mind. Through education we are able to put our own thoughts together and expand our mind to more then we can see. Education is responsible for everything we see around us in our world today. So who's to say that everyone shouldn't at least have a shot. Growing up and around Richmond California, I have seen a great number of people who had their lives changed simply because of a book. To these individuals, realizing that there is more out there then just what they see, is the biggest step in their lives. The being to stray away from their hardships like gang violence and fights and move towards a life of promise and potential. This is just one example of many.
After studying the current situtation Africa and talking to those who have seen it first hand, it too has become clear that education has not only changed their lives but improved them drastically. Many farming techniques and helpful adivice weren't just thrown at the people, they were learned. A teacher I talked to recently about this topic also told me how much the impovrished of the Sub-Saharian thrist for knowlodge and truly want to have an opportunity in life.
All in all these topics come down to nothing more then morals and integirty. It is only by looking in your heart that you can see the value in helping the world.
"The Mustard Weed."
The mustard seed tells us that the Kingdom of God is not something thats pretty and glamorous, rather it's something we often don't necessarily want anything to do with, i.e. helping that beaten man on the side of the road (good samaritan). However, the beauty of the parable comes this form; as we are exposed to the mustard seed, we become immersed in it and are then almost forced to make good of it, which comes in the form of the great taste and spice that is made from the "horrible" seed. This directly paralles life by showing how something we see as a pest, helping the homeless, Africa,and other so called "pests", are truly rewarding if we choose to harvest that weed or pest.
Monday, September 24, 2007
Digital Portfolio: Executive Summary on Africa
The world's issues don't need to be met head on all at once, the key to ending the strife and suffering of the world is to take one step at a time. In the word's of "What aboout Bob?" baby steps...baby steps.
Dr. Jeffry Sachs, leader on Extreme Poverty and Ambassador to the U.N., has developed what seems to be the grand-solution of extrmeme povertty in Africa. Dr. Sachs has devoted his life to the study of extreme poverty. In his studies, it hasd become clear that the impovrished African people are only dollars away from a healthy and prosperous life. Although the large scale Africa seems to have no resolution, the pieces of Africa; villages and tribes, need only a few measures of protection: seed,nets, and a few shots, to have their problems washed away. Dr. Sach's plan of action calls for a $200 billion grant that would be desperesed to the villages of Africa, to pay for some simmples. This "rigorious" call to action calls for only a few essentails: $110/year/person for basic needs such as fertilizer, high yield seeds, clean water, rudimentary health care, basic education, mosqutio nets, and some form of communication link to the rest of the world. These items are easily can be easily obtained, ensuring that millions of lives are saved. Test villages, called "Millenium Villages" have been monitored and maintained for over a year. Their results show not only an increase in crop, but also a 2/3 drop in cases of Malaria, and an a huge climb in attendence of children at school. This shows that with courage and determination, the end to Extreme Poverty is in sight.
After watching and reading about Dr. Sach's work, its become clear that "sacrafice" is needed to help those in need. The work of Dr.Sachs ties hand in hand with the idea of the Good Samaritan, by showing the true vaule of human life. It is not enough to say that only your life matters in this world, because believe it or nothing, without the people around you and the people in the world, you don't exist. Life has no meaning if you have nobody to share it with. In the case of the Good Samaritan, he valued the life of that naked and beaten body. Dr. Sachs sees the true value of life in the people of Africa. It is here that we see a Good Samaritan doing what he can to make sure the person next to him has just as much a chance in life as he does.
As far as our immediate class community is concerned, I'm not going to lie, it's tough to give up something that we are used to. However, if you can look deep enough, their is always something you can do away with to help not only your on personal greed but also save money for a cause above all others, human life. If you can manage to do away with just one off campus lunch a month, that's $5-10 dollars you can put towards a greater good. Even if you don't want to give up that lunch, you can take your pocket change from that lunch, throw it in a jar everyday, and watch it grow as it becomes substansial. I think we should start a collection at school for change or any type of donation. At the end of the year, we should write a letter to Dr. Sachs, explain our learning of him and send whatever we can round up and put it towards the Millenium Project.
The key in all of this, is to understand that this isn't about how much money you give, it's about seeing others outside of your immediate surroundings. It's about realizing whatb being a neighbor truly is. It's about appreciating the true value of human life.
Dr. Jeffry Sachs, leader on Extreme Poverty and Ambassador to the U.N., has developed what seems to be the grand-solution of extrmeme povertty in Africa. Dr. Sachs has devoted his life to the study of extreme poverty. In his studies, it hasd become clear that the impovrished African people are only dollars away from a healthy and prosperous life. Although the large scale Africa seems to have no resolution, the pieces of Africa; villages and tribes, need only a few measures of protection: seed,nets, and a few shots, to have their problems washed away. Dr. Sach's plan of action calls for a $200 billion grant that would be desperesed to the villages of Africa, to pay for some simmples. This "rigorious" call to action calls for only a few essentails: $110/year/person for basic needs such as fertilizer, high yield seeds, clean water, rudimentary health care, basic education, mosqutio nets, and some form of communication link to the rest of the world. These items are easily can be easily obtained, ensuring that millions of lives are saved. Test villages, called "Millenium Villages" have been monitored and maintained for over a year. Their results show not only an increase in crop, but also a 2/3 drop in cases of Malaria, and an a huge climb in attendence of children at school. This shows that with courage and determination, the end to Extreme Poverty is in sight.
After watching and reading about Dr. Sach's work, its become clear that "sacrafice" is needed to help those in need. The work of Dr.Sachs ties hand in hand with the idea of the Good Samaritan, by showing the true vaule of human life. It is not enough to say that only your life matters in this world, because believe it or nothing, without the people around you and the people in the world, you don't exist. Life has no meaning if you have nobody to share it with. In the case of the Good Samaritan, he valued the life of that naked and beaten body. Dr. Sachs sees the true value of life in the people of Africa. It is here that we see a Good Samaritan doing what he can to make sure the person next to him has just as much a chance in life as he does.
As far as our immediate class community is concerned, I'm not going to lie, it's tough to give up something that we are used to. However, if you can look deep enough, their is always something you can do away with to help not only your on personal greed but also save money for a cause above all others, human life. If you can manage to do away with just one off campus lunch a month, that's $5-10 dollars you can put towards a greater good. Even if you don't want to give up that lunch, you can take your pocket change from that lunch, throw it in a jar everyday, and watch it grow as it becomes substansial. I think we should start a collection at school for change or any type of donation. At the end of the year, we should write a letter to Dr. Sachs, explain our learning of him and send whatever we can round up and put it towards the Millenium Project.
The key in all of this, is to understand that this isn't about how much money you give, it's about seeing others outside of your immediate surroundings. It's about realizing whatb being a neighbor truly is. It's about appreciating the true value of human life.
Sunday, September 16, 2007
"Portfolio 2: Singer on Poverty."
- How much should I give to others? 2. Are we obligated to give to others? 3. Is it my job as a middle class american to provide for others? 4. Should I give money to someone I've never met? 5. Why not help our immediate surroundings first? 6. Equality on everything? 7. Does greed and wealth have a fixed place in our society/economy? 8. How much inequaltiy do we tolereate, assuming it is necessary? 9. Should I be ashamed of my country? 10. What makes someone more deserving then someone else?
"Portfolio 2: Good Samaritan Interpretation,"
After reading and studying the Parable of the Good Samaritan for more years then i can remember it becomes clear that Jesus final word usually comes as question. In the case of the Good Samaritan he basically tells the laywer that since your the expert tell me what you know. When Jesus says he is right, Jesus then assumes the seat of being the expert on Law. This shows the power of Jesus' word. Anyways back to the topis of the timelessness of the parable, what makes this parable meaning so powerful is that it shows how fear and greed can grip us and sail us away from being a true neighbor. The Levite and Priest were overcome with fear of possible robbery/diease, and the pride that told them they were better. Jesus is telling us that to truly inheirt a full life, we must overcome our fear and our greed "cockyness". Just yesterday in Berkeley, i found myself referring to this class topic, there was a homeless dude laying in the middle of the sidewalk, passed out and asking for water,I was just going to pass him, but i looked past the fear and greed I have lived with, I physically picked him up, stood him on the stairs and gave him water. He smiled and passed out again. I dont care that he didnt say anything or that people gave me dirty looks, I was just happy that the dude wasnt in the middle of the sidewalk getting steped on. I realized then that the man was my neighbor, even though we came from different places.
Monday, September 10, 2007
"Portfolio 1: John the Baptist
John is a preacher man in the deserts of Galilee. He calls to a mass of people to follow him into the waters so that he can wash away their sins. This doesn't mean that he is literally washing sins off, it is rather a recognition of the wrongs the people had committed, and their new life to make good. John was seen as a man with a mission, crazy by some, inspirational to others. The way John speaks shows how he is not claiming himself to be the Messiah, rather he is preparing the people for Jesus. When the people being to question him and call him the Messiah, he speaks how a greater and mightier one will come, to finish their recognition of their wrongs and truly bring the to new life. The first story of John gives how he is almost one step underneath Jesus. His birth was indeed blessed by God, however he was a truly mortal man, blessed beyond doubt, but mortal. Jesus was the man of God, his own seed brought to the Earth. Both stories set up for the next best thing. When I say this I mean that John is the introduction of Jesus. John is pre-heating the oven for the people. He is showing them what is coming and how they can prepare themselves for it. So, it becomes clear that Jesus' teaching are going to be an extended and almost more advanced version of John's cries from the desert. The teachings havent necessarly been committed to one social class over another. The reading shows how the soliders, the poor, and even the tax collectors, all gathered to hear John's messgae. This forshadows the possibilty that Jesus will touch more then just the poor communtiy he came from.
Sunday, September 9, 2007
"Portfolio 1: Refugee Jesus"
After discussing Jesus' life of being a fefugee, it makes me wonder about the motivation of his ministry. His overall mission was to help those poor and opressed people he lived with. No doubt he was pissed off as hell at the system that kept him and his people down for so long. He didnt want to fight, but he wanted to make the people aware of what was going on. The times of Jesus were times of almost drones who were ruled by an iron fist. So, pissed off Jesus, with his rags and broken sandles, said screw this, its time to change. He knew the life of the poor, he knew the life that was feard by the top. It became this man's mission to spread word to everyone that they deserved the fancy robes, just as much as the fat man sitting on his chair being fed grapes. By knowing the lowly, even bring the lowly, it was clear that he had to make the moves necessary. His mind had to have been filled with the struggles of his people, the deaths of his people, just his people. This was more then enough motivation for the son of MAN!!
Monday, September 3, 2007
Portfolio 1: Who’s Your Momma?”
To me, society has made Mary the ideal of purity and human faith. Moving through Catholic schools I have been taught to view Mary as the perfect and loving mother everyone has known for so long. Through all my experiences I have never really been shown any different, besides Milhay's Scripture class. It's wasnt until then that Mary became more of a real person; one who goes through the headache and heartache. The other aspect that has been stamped on me time and time again is the idea that Mary was this perfect subtle figure with fair skin, emotionless face, who always seemed reverent and clamn. It also seems that she always has some type of religious relic on her person at all times. Like I find it hard to believe that she would go party with scripture in her pocket. 2.) Mary is a women of strong faith who procliams tells her story openly to a husband who by Jewish law is to shame her and put her to death. This shows just how much strong faith Mary had. Mary belongs to the lower class of Judea. Women are treated as personal property that belongs to one man, and one man alone. The community would undoubtly find her pregenancy an unfaithful act that deserves severe isolation and most likey death. 3.) I believe that God chose Mary for a number of reasons. First because of her willing and open faith in God. It's not everyday that someone excepts their calling from God, especially one with such great magnitude. Also the fact that this act showed just how un-selfish Mary was. She didnt think of her own needs, rather she knew that she would be doing a great service to the world. Another imprtant aspect is Mary's background and family. She wasn't a rich spolied girl, rather she was an poor and humble women of Judea. This is important because it meant she would take good care of her mission and not go blabbing her mouth to anyone and everyone that she has the child of God chilling in her uterus. Undoubtly it was Mary's faith and purity that made her the top choice for God.
Tuesday, August 28, 2007
" A Family of Freedom Fighters"
The story of Tamar is one of great scarafice and purpose, though any means necessary. Tamar was a direct decendent of Noah, and family of great pride and purpose. She was given up for marriage to the son of Judah, Er. Together they lived for awhile yet Tamar remained barren, this was often seen as a punishment from God. However God found Er displeasing and took Er's life away. Judah then told his next eldest son Onan to go forth and have relations with Tamar so that his brother's name may carry on. Onan was not up for this idea because he knew the child would not be considered his own. So Onan defived his father's orders and Tamar remained bareen. God found Onan's actions to be displeasing. God then took Onan's life. Judah then told Tamar to go live in her father's house as a widow until his youngest son was of age. A long time passd and no sign of the youngest brother Shelah was seen. Word passed to Tamar that Judah would be passing her way on his way to Timnah. Tamer then took off her widow's garments and pput a veil over herself. She met Judah on his way and had realtions with him; Judah not knowing that this was his daughter-in-law. After their relations Tamar asked for some type of pledge that would gurantee their child's place in the family. Judah gave his seal, staff, and belt to her. Time passed and Tamar became noticeably pregnent. Word reached Judah that his daughter-in-law had become pregnent. He charged that she be burned for her crime of un-chastity. When she was brought before Judah she presented him with the tokens he had given her when they had their realtions. Judah was dumb-founded and gave into his pregent daughter-in-law. She gave birth to twin sons, Zaragand Pharez, giving her a place in the family and an inheritence to her children.
By including Tamar in Jesus' geneology, Matthew is attemping to show us a key message in Christ's teachings. This is that no matter how down and out times may seem, God will always fulfill his promise to bring life to the Jewish people for generations and generations, no matter how steep the odds may be. Also, it is a story of love and devotion to our loved ones and their legacy. Tamar not only wanted children to love and cherish, but she also wanted a piece of her husband that could grow and thirve in the world. It was her devotion that pushed her through, much like the devotion of love Jesus taught. It also, like Jesus, teaches us that we must sometimes put ourselves and what we believe in on the line to get what is right done. Although the means by which Tamar had to secure herself and her family's well being may seem odd and not like the teaching of Christ, they still have a foundation of love and devotion, two of the main callings of Jesus. Another aspect to look at is that Jesus did not simply come up with his teachings all on his own, he used family stories and experiences to move forward in his life's mission.
By including Tamar in Jesus' geneology, Matthew is attemping to show us a key message in Christ's teachings. This is that no matter how down and out times may seem, God will always fulfill his promise to bring life to the Jewish people for generations and generations, no matter how steep the odds may be. Also, it is a story of love and devotion to our loved ones and their legacy. Tamar not only wanted children to love and cherish, but she also wanted a piece of her husband that could grow and thirve in the world. It was her devotion that pushed her through, much like the devotion of love Jesus taught. It also, like Jesus, teaches us that we must sometimes put ourselves and what we believe in on the line to get what is right done. Although the means by which Tamar had to secure herself and her family's well being may seem odd and not like the teaching of Christ, they still have a foundation of love and devotion, two of the main callings of Jesus. Another aspect to look at is that Jesus did not simply come up with his teachings all on his own, he used family stories and experiences to move forward in his life's mission.
Sunday, August 26, 2007
"Portfolio 1: What I think I can Achieve."
This semester in Parables, I shoot for nothing less then an A. I feel that with the class we have and all the possible discussions to come, this class will almost be impossible to fail. I find our open forums to be very insightful and helpful in our task of learning. Also, blogging helps each person to be able to express whatever they need. The class in itself, without the blog or classmates, is set up to really engage students in the art that is storytelling, which makes sucess in this class that much more attainable.
I declare that every Parables assignment will be done to my utmost ability, and that learning will be my true drive to success. Whether I reach the A or not, as long as I have achieved a strong hold on the subject, I will come out ahead.
I declare that every Parables assignment will be done to my utmost ability, and that learning will be my true drive to success. Whether I reach the A or not, as long as I have achieved a strong hold on the subject, I will come out ahead.
Portfolio 1: "Who is Jesus, Really?"
Growing up a grandson of a priest I've always been around or near written and oral teaching of the Chirstian Faith. From a young age I have always been told that it's not about the mysticism and awe of the "supernatural" Jesus, but rather the physically and spiritual impact of the words that were spoken and written. To me Jesus is much more then a man who lived, he is a way of life. Through the many Gospel readings I've heard, and sermon after sermon, it has become clear that Jesus is the idea of a life filled with love, compassion, and overall right. In a sense, its perfectly just to call Jesus the 'Greatest Story Ever Told'. As we have learned in our first couple of classes, stories teach, Jesus taught, we learn. So in essence, Jesus is a story, that teaches us to live and love. As we listen to stories of Jesus, we are not literally replaying an event that happened persay, however we are creating a scene that helps understand and evaulate ourselves as we grow and live.
I feel that at times I stray away from what is right as Jesus taught, however, its not about following Jesus' word to the letter. To live a life a through Chirst you must decipher what you find to be Christ. When I say this I mean, you must decide what you know in your heart and mind to be right.
I feel that at times I stray away from what is right as Jesus taught, however, its not about following Jesus' word to the letter. To live a life a through Chirst you must decipher what you find to be Christ. When I say this I mean, you must decide what you know in your heart and mind to be right.
Thursday, August 23, 2007
Portfolio 1: Why We Tell Stories
One story that has really stuck with me for my adolencent and young adult life has been the story of my grandfather. Every family get together there comes a new story about the amazing person that is my grandfather. It all starts with him living as a young boy in England during WWII and how he was seprerated from his eleven brothers and sisters. This story has a particular place in my life because it was through the church that my grandfather found a peace during such times of war. When the air raids began in England, Grandy was put on a train will thousands of other chirldren heading for the most Northern parts of the United Kingdom. As the children were seperated he became lost in the confusion and was seperated from the ones he loved. During these first weeks he felt alone and affraid. However, during his second month of living away he came across a small chapel just outside of Edinburaugh. Here he was comforted by the images of saints and religous relics. It was also here that he met some of the most influencial people of his life. To keep his mind away from the troubles of the War, he began a life of prayer and study. It was in and around that chapel that he learned the physics that would soon lead to great discoeries and invention. It was here that he would be called by God to work and live as a priest of the people. This story really sticks out in my mind because it was the Church that led my grandfather to be the person he is. It really give me a stronger sense of faith, not only in God and religion, but also the perseverance of the human spirit.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)